Browsing by Author "B H T"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    UTS PA TR EGAUGNAL ATIALAW ROF GNIGGAT HCEEPS FO HTIROGLA DIRBYH GNISU M
    (Hawassa University, 2024-03-12) B H T
    taN Lang au ge orP c nisse g si a dleif fo c retupmo ,ecneics a ifitr c lai illetni g ,ecne na d lanoitatupmoc nil g scitsiu recnoc n de htiw eht noitcaretni neewteb etupmoc rs dna amuh n larutan( ) nal g au g .se traP - fo -sp ee ch gat g ni g si eht secorp s fo citamotua oitatonna n fo lex laci etac go seir . traP - fo - ps e hce tagging a iss g sn na airporppa te ap rt- fo - eps e hc tag rof ea hc drow ni a ecnetnes fo al larutan ngua .seg T eh strap -of- eps ech (Po )S gat ging for Wo atial nal guage si not suf eicif tn yet ot eb esu d as o en i tropm a tn co nopm e tn in ot reh an t laru lan ug a eg pro ssec ing (NLP) app itacil o sn . In ht is er s ae rch, eht rap t of eeps ch ggat er for eht W atialo Lang au ge si desab no a hy irb d hcaorppa ; ti senibmoc the eluR - ab s de ohtem d htiw na MH M .ledom As we ah ve denoitnem , ht e eluR - desab dohtem si c desopmo fo eerht spets : el x noci ana lyz ,re rom p oloh g laci ana ly ez ,r na d sy atn x ana lyz re . tsomlA lla drow s a er cer og in z de by the lur e- esab d m .dohte ewoH v re , emos ton era smret ana lyz o de r t esehT .deifissalcsim re tser eht( sm f smret delia ) ana eb lliw lyz gnisu de .ledom MMH eht For mi p emel n tat i no and ex rep i ,tnem eht aut roh desu py ht on rp og ar mm ing na d NLTK. F ro tagging pu esopr ew desu 71 PoS at g .stes F ro niniart g and tset ing ht e mod le , 529,97 aloW i at gaugnal e row sd ra e co etcell d f or m th er e id f ef rent ca get ro ei s. rF om eht e eritn co ,supr 09 % si u es d for t iar n ni g and t eh re am i gnin 10% si desu for set ting pu opr es . T eh p ofre rma cn e fo ht e tagger, a er te dets by u is ng differ tne op itr on niart ing tad a tes su ing p re cent ega sp til em thod. ccA ord ni gly, fa t re roc r itce ng namuh dna gnilleps rre o ,sr eht pe rofr m cna e fo eht tagger swohs 066 69 sdrow )%77.59( rroc e tc ly ta degg drow s rof eluR B desa dna 32 91 sdrow )%2.99( roc r tce ly ta degg sdrow rof HMM ledom in eht iarT _n eS t. ehT ep r namrof ce fo eht tagger swohs 6 559 sdrow ( 09 . %5 ) oc rr tce ly ta degg sdrow of r eluR B esa d dna 72 7 wo sdr %4.89( ) oc r tcer ly tagged sdrow rof MMH mo led ni eht tseT -s .te sA a ,tluser eht luser ts fo the ex stnemirep rof htob eluR sesab dna MMH algo smhtir wohs an cca uracy fo %31.39 and %3.89 oc rre tc ly at gged sdrow no average ser pec evit ly. I cn r isae ng ht e is ze fo niniart g atad dna ex ninima g ht e gat g re eulfni n sec eht .tluser tluseR morf ruo ex tnemirep swohs th ta nidda g fo MMH ta gg er smrofrep tteb er tluser naht elur desab ta egg r enola .