PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF GOLDA SMALL-SCALE IRRIGATION SCHEME IN ASSOSA WOREDA, BENISHANGUL GUMUZ REGIONAL STATE, ETHIOPIA
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2019-10-27
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Hawassa University
Abstract
Evaluation of the performance of irrigation schemes helps to know the present status of the
scheme and to apply possible measures for improvement. Golda small scale irrigation scheme
was found in Assosa, Benishangul Gumuz regional state, Ethiopia and had a service of six years.
The performance of Golda Small Scale Irrigation Scheme had not been evaluated before this
study. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the scheme by considering water delivery
performance, on field water management performance and organizational setups and their
performance for irrigation water management and maintenance. Primary data collected through
field measurements and household field survey, and secondary data from different sources were
used. Water delivery was evaluated by external indicators such as conveyance efficiency, relative
water supply and relative irrigation supply. Both internal and external indicators were used for
evaluating on field water management performance. The internal indicators were application
efficiency, storage efficiency, distribution uniformity and deep percolation ratio. The external
indicators like agricultural out puts, physical and financial indicators were used. The result of
conveyance efficiency, application efficiency, storage efficiency, distribution efficiency and deep
percolation ratio, were 53%, 51.6%, 91.6%, 80.76% & 40% respectively. The value of relative
water supply and relative irrigation supply were 1.6 and 1.2 respectively. The result of output
per unit command area, output per unit irrigated area, output per unit water supply and output
per unit water consumed were 3542.66US$, 4306.76US$, 1.42 and 0.69, respectively. The result
of the physical indicators, which were irrigation ratio and sustainability of irrigated area, were
found to be 0.82 and 1, respectively. Around 54% of gross return on investment was obtained..
About 67.6% of respondents reflected the maintenance condition of the irrigation scheme was
bad. Unfair distribution of water was due to water scarcity and illegal water users as the
beneficiaries responded. Generally, the scheme requires improvement measures
Description
Keywords
efficiency, external indicators, internal indicators, irrigation, performance, SSIS
